Comparison Overview
OnTrac Last Mile Operations

OnTrac Last Mile Operations
8401 Greensboro Dr, McLean, 22102, US
Last Update: 12/03/2026
OnTrac is the premier provider for freight brokering, including overnight services! We offer business opportunities for local transportation providers who are interested in contracting their delivery services and ready to deliver an an exceptional quality of service in...

ID Logistics Group
55, Chemin des Engranauds, Orgon, 13660, FR
Last Update: 14/09/2026
ID Logistics, headed by Eric Hémar, is an international contract logistics group with revenues of €3.3 billion in 2024. ID Logistics manages nearly 450 sites in 19 countries, representing more than 9 million m² operated in Europe, America, Asia and Africa, with 42,000 e...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

OnTrac Last Mile Operations







ID Logistics Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for OnTrac Last Mile Operations in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ID Logistics Group in 2026.
Incident History - OnTrac Last Mile Operations (X = Date, Y = Severity)
OnTrac Last Mile Operations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ID Logistics Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ID Logistics Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

OnTrac Last Mile Operations

ID Logistics Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.