Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OnTrac Last Mile OperationsOnTrac Last Mile Operations
VS
C.H. RobinsonC.H. Robinson
OnTrac Last Mile Operations

OnTrac Last Mile Operations

8401 Greensboro Dr, McLean, 22102, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile

OnTrac is the premier provider for freight brokering, including overnight services! We offer business opportunities for local transportation providers who are interested in contracting their delivery services and ready to deliver an an exceptional quality of service in...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
C.H. Robinson

C.H. Robinson

14701 Charlson Road, Eden Prairie, 55347, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

C.H. Robinson is the global leader in Lean AI supply chains. For more than a century, companies everywhere have looked to us to reimagine how goods move. Now, as we redefine what’s next for the industry, that same drive fuels our commitment to Building Tomorrow’s Supply...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:19,093
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OnTrac Last Mile Operations

OnTrac Last Mile Operations

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
C.H. Robinson

C.H. Robinson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OnTrac Last Mile Operations in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C.H. Robinson in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OnTrac Last Mile Operations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OnTrac Last Mile Operations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - C.H. Robinson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C.H. Robinson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OnTrac Last Mile Operations

OnTrac Last Mile Operations

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
C.H. Robinson

C.H. Robinson

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations company and C.H. Robinson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations and C.H. Robinson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations and C.H. Robinson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OnTrac Last Mile Operations or C.H. Robinson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OnTrac Last Mile Operations or C.H. Robinson ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations and C.H. Robinson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OnTrac Last Mile Operations and C.H. Robinson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2