Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OneSubseaOneSubsea
VS
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.
OneSubsea

OneSubsea

915 N Eldridge Pkwy, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.onesubsea.com
763/1000Fair

SLB OneSubsea is the world’s leading subsea technology and solutions provider, focused on accelerating innovation to improve subsea asset performance, while increasing energy efficiency and reducing CO2 emissions. We are a joint venture backed by SLB, Aker Solutions, a...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:7,023
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Avenida. Libertador con calle El Empalme , Caracas, 1050, VE

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.pdvsa.com
645/1000Poor

Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. is a Venezuelan state company, began operations on January 1st, 1976 and whose activities are the oil exploration, production, refining, marketing and transportation of Venezuelan oil as well as the orimulsion, chemical, petrochemical busines...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:25,708
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OneSubsea

OneSubsea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

OneSubsea has 58.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OneSubsea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OneSubsea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OneSubsea

OneSubsea

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ONE1767600666
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1776853705
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1768583981
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1765893364

FAQ

Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OneSubsea company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OneSubsea and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OneSubsea and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OneSubsea or PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OneSubsea or PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ?
Between OneSubsea and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OneSubsea and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2