Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OneSight EssilorLuxottica FoundationOneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation
VS
International SOSInternational SOS
OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation

OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation

undefined, Paris, undefined, undefined, FR

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

The OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation is a registered charitable organization, reflecting the commitment and values of EssilorLuxottica to help eliminate uncorrected poor vision in a generation. The OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation is headquartered in France, w...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:144
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
International SOS

International SOS

#17-00 Odeon Towers, Singapore, 188720, SG

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
790/1000Fair

The International SOS Group of Companies has been in the business of saving lives for over 40 years. Protecting global workforces from health and security threats, we deliver customised health, security risk management and wellbeing solutions to fuel our clients’ growth...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,372
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation

OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
International SOS

International SOS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International SOS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - International SOS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International SOS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation

OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
International SOS

International SOS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
INT425072525

FAQ

Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation company and International SOS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation and International SOS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation and International SOS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation or International SOS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation or International SOS ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation and International SOS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OneSight EssilorLuxottica Foundation and International SOS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2