Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Onela (Etre bien chez soi)Onela (Etre bien chez soi)
VS
Home InsteadHome Instead
Onela (Etre bien chez soi)

Onela (Etre bien chez soi)

35, Rue de Paris, Boulogne-Billancourt, 92100, FR

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.onela.com
762/1000Fair

ONELA est un spécialiste de l’aide à domicile depuis 2006, reconnu pour la qualité de ses prestations à destination des personnes âgées, handicapées et en convalescence, ainsi qu’à leurs aidants. ONELA participe aujourd’hui au bien-être de plus de 12 000 personnes sur l...

NAICS:6241
NAICS Definition:Individual and Family Services
Employees:913
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Home Instead

Home Instead

13323 California St, Omaha, NE, US, 68154

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.homeinstead.com
784/1000Fair

As the world’s leading provider of in-home care, we help older adults live safely and independently at home, without sacrificing their quality of life. Whether they need occasional respite care or full-time support, our Care Pros are carefully selected to provide the be...

NAICS:6241
NAICS Definition:Individual and Family Services
Employees:25,165
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Onela (Etre bien chez soi)

Onela (Etre bien chez soi)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Home Instead

Home Instead

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Individual and Family Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Onela (Etre bien chez soi) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Individual and Family Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Home Instead in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Onela (Etre bien chez soi) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Onela (Etre bien chez soi) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Home Instead (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Home Instead cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Onela (Etre bien chez soi)

Onela (Etre bien chez soi)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Home Instead

Home Instead

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) company and Home Instead company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) and Home Instead, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) and Home Instead, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Onela (Etre bien chez soi) or Home Instead ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Onela (Etre bien chez soi) or Home Instead ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) and Home Instead, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Onela (Etre bien chez soi) and Home Instead, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2