Comparison Overview

Provizor Federal, Inc.

VS

ManpowerGroup

Provizor Federal, Inc.

undefined, Columbia, MD, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Provizor Federal manages thousands of healthcare professionals at military base facilities across the continental United States and its territories. We focus on long-term staffing and medical support services under multi-year federal contracts. We are not an agency nor a placement service! Currently, we maintain thousands health care workers in our national database, including on-call 24-hours-a-day staffing of nurses and other health care professionals. ***NEW WEBSITE PENDING***

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 82
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ManpowerGroup

100 Manpower Place, None, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, 53212
Last Update: 2025-08-13 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

ManpowerGroupยฎ (NYSE: MAN), the leading global workforce solutions company, helps organizations transform in a fast-changing world of work by sourcing, assessing, developing and managing the talent that enables them to win. We develop innovative solutions for hundreds of thousands of organizations every year, providing them with skilled talent while finding meaningful, sustainable employment for millions of people across a wide range of industries and skills. Our expert family of brands โ€“ Manpower, Experis and Talent Solutions โ€“ creates substantially more value for candidates and clients across more than 80 countries and territories and has done so for 75 years. We are recognized consistently for our diversity - as a best place to work for Women, Inclusion, Equality and Disability and in 2023 ManpowerGroup was named one of the World's Most Ethical Companies for the 14th year - all confirming our position as the brand of choice for in-demand talent. See how ManpowerGroup is powering the future of work: www.manpowergroup.com

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 72,018
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omv-medical-inc-.jpeg
Provizor Federal, Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpowergroup.jpeg
ManpowerGroup
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Provizor Federal, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ManpowerGroup
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Provizor Federal, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

ManpowerGroup has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History โ€” Provizor Federal, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Provizor Federal, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ManpowerGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ManpowerGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/omv-medical-inc-.jpeg
Provizor Federal, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpowergroup.jpeg
ManpowerGroup
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Network Intrusion (likely via unpatched vulnerability or phishing), Social Engineering (impersonating IT support via fake calls)
Motivation: Financial gain (ransomware) / Data theft, Data theft / Corporate espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Provizor Federal, Inc. company and ManpowerGroup company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

ManpowerGroup company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Provizor Federal, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, ManpowerGroup company has reported more cyber incidents than Provizor Federal, Inc. company.

ManpowerGroup company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Provizor Federal, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ManpowerGroup company nor Provizor Federal, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ManpowerGroup company nor Provizor Federal, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Provizor Federal, Inc. company nor ManpowerGroup company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

ManpowerGroup company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Provizor Federal, Inc. company.

ManpowerGroup company employs more people globally than Provizor Federal, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.