Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OMRON Automation and Robotics New ZealandOMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand
VS
KUKAKUKA
OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand

OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand

65 Boston Rd, Auckland, 1023, NZ

Last Update: 14/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.store.omron.co.nz
743/1000Moderate

Industrial automation products are at the heart of our modern society. whether they monitor and control Manufacturing processes, or regulate electronic devices, improve safety systems or even just make home appliances more reliable, industrial Automation products are am...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:15
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KUKA

KUKA

Zugspitzstr. 140, Augsburg, 86165, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kuka.com
781/1000Fair

KUKA SE & Co. KGaA is a global leader in intelligent automation solutions, generating around 3.7 billion euro in sales and employing approximately 15,000 people worldwide. Headquartered in Augsburg, Germany, KUKA’s mission is to make automation accessible for everyone -...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,671
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand

OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KUKA

KUKA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KUKA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KUKA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KUKA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand

OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KUKA

KUKA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand company and KUKA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand and KUKA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand and KUKA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand or KUKA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand or KUKA ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand and KUKA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OMRON Automation and Robotics New Zealand and KUKA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2