Comparison Overview
Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub
Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub
3 Innovation Road - Level 1, Macquarie University, Ryde, 2109, AU
Last Update: 19/03/2026
The Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub takes a unique interdisciplinary approach to cybersecurity, fostering an ideal ecosystem for collaboration among partners in business, government, research, and education. Our mission is to strengthen resilience, security, and...
Virginia Commonwealth University
910 W Franklin St, Richmond, va, US, 23284-2512
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We’re Virginia Commonwealth University — the university FOR Virginia. You will see an incredible mix of attitudes, styles and stories. Inclusion is our heartbeat and it drives us to tackle difficult challenges others can’t or won’t. We do things differently here, be...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub
Virginia Commonwealth University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Virginia Commonwealth University in 2026.
Incident History - Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Virginia Commonwealth University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Virginia Commonwealth University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Macquarie University Cyber Security Hub
Virginia Commonwealth University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.