Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo SoftwareOmnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software
VS
AtosAtos
Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software

Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software

Viale Ludovico Ariosto, 492/P, Sesto Fiorentino, 50019, IT

Last Update: 20/07/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.omniagroup.it/
683/1000Weak

Da oltre 20 anni, Omnia Group affianca alcune delle più grandi aziende italiane con soluzioni tecnologiche custom per aumentare l'efficienza, abbassare i costi di gestione, migliorare tutti i processi di business, anche quelli più complessi. L’esperienza Omnia Group su ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:72
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Atos

Atos

80 Quai Voltaire, 95877 Bezons, FR

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.atos.net
753/1000Fair

Atos Group is a global leader in digital transformation with c. 67,000 employees and annual revenue of c. €10 billion, operating in 61 countries under two brands — Atos for services and Eviden for products. European number one in cybersecurity, cloud and high performanc...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:87,005
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software

Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atos

Atos

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atos in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software

Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OMN1784557564
Atos

Atos

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software company and Atos company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software and Atos, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software and Atos, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software or Atos ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software or Atos ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software and Atos, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Omnia Group - Consulenza Informatica & Sviluppo Software and Atos, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8