Comparison Overview

Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA

VS

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA

Lázaro Cárdenas 2225, Edificio Latitud, San Pedro Garza García, Nuevo León, MX, 66260
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

OMA operates and manages thirteen airports in nine states in central and northern region Mexico: Monterrey, Mexico’s second most important business city; Acapulco, Mazatlán and Zihuatanejo: attractive tourist destinations; Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Culiacán, Durango, Reynosa, San Luis Potosí, Tampico, Torreón, and Zacatecas: key regional and border centers. OMA's airports serve about 14 million domestic and international passengers with aeronautical and commercial services that meet international safety, security, environmental, and quality standards and provide our customers a pleasant and safe experience at our airports. Recently, OMA joined with international hotel operator NH Hoteles from Spain to develop, operate and manage, 5-star hotel (NH Mexco City Airport T2 Hotel) and about 5,000 m2 in commercial space inside Terminal 2 of Mexico City International Airport (AICM). Our more than 960 employees are committed to offering aeronautical and ommercial services that comply with international standards for quality and safety. OMA also provides cargo handling, storage, and logistics services through OMA Carga at our cargo terminals strategically located in the airports of Monterrey and Chihuahua. We enjoy the support of Servicios de Tecnologia Aeroportuaria, S.A. de C.V. (SETA), our strategic partner, which is jointly owned by two leaders in airport services and infrastructure operations: Aéroports de Paris Management and Empresas ICA. OMA is listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange under the ticker OMA, and on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the ticker OMAB.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 494
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

Amsterdamseweg 55, None, Amstelveen, None, NL, 1182 GP
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to major cities and economic centres all over the world. Through our LinkedIn account, we make sure you are kept up-to-date about KLM and other developments in the air transport industry.

NAICS: 481
NAICS Definition: Air Transportation
Employees: 22,391
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oma-aeropuertos.jpeg
Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klm.jpeg
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA in 2025.

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Average (This Year)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines has 127.27% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oma-aeropuertos.jpeg
Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klm.jpeg
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI-Amplified Social Engineering, Third-Party Customer Service Platform Exploitation, Voice Cloning, Deepfake Impersonation
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Monetization, Identity Theft, Loyalty Program Fraud
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party system compromise
Motivation: Potential misuse in targeted scams
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company has not reported any.

In the current year, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has reported more cyber incidents than Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company.

Neither KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company nor Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company.

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines company employs more people globally than Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA company, reflecting its scale as a Airlines and Aviation.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Grupo Aeroportuario Centro Norte, OMA nor KLM Royal Dutch Airlines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H