Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Oliver Wyman VectorOliver Wyman Vector
VS
SafranSafran
Oliver Wyman Vector

Oliver Wyman Vector

1500 Solana Blvd, Suite 3500, Westlake, Texas, US, 76262

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

Oliver Wyman Vector offers top-tier technical consulting and services to the aviation, aerospace, defense, and rail sectors worldwide. Our experienced team, part of the Oliver Wyman Transportation and Services Practice, delivers impactful solutions to complex industry c...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:308
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Safran

Safran

2, Boulevard du général Martial Valin, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.safran-group.com/
817/1000Good

Safran is an international high-technology group, operating in the aviation (propulsion, equipment and interiors), defense and space markets. Its core purpose is to contribute to a safer, more sustainable world, where air transport is more environmentally friendly, comf...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:76,002
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Oliver Wyman Vector

Oliver Wyman Vector

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Safran

Safran

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oliver Wyman Vector in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safran in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Oliver Wyman Vector (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oliver Wyman Vector cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Safran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Oliver Wyman Vector

Oliver Wyman Vector

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Safran

Safran

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
SAF04481023

FAQ

Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector company and Safran company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector and Safran, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector and Safran, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Oliver Wyman Vector or Safran ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Oliver Wyman Vector or Safran ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector and Safran, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Oliver Wyman Vector and Safran, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA