Comparison Overview

Old Mutual

VS

Deutsche Bank

Old Mutual

107 Rivonia Rd, Johannesburg, Gauteng, undefined, ZA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Old Mutual Limited is a listed company on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange and has secondary listings on the London, Malawi, Namibia and Zimbabwe stock exchanges. As a Pan-African financial services company, we are focused on Africa, her needs and her people. Together with you, we have educated our children, given more homes warmth and light, empowered small businesses and improved infrastructure in Africa. Our story will continue #WithAfricaForAfrica.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12,699
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Deutsche Bank

Taunusanlage 12, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, 60325, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Deutsche Bank is the leading German bank with strong European roots and a global network. The bank focuses on its strengths in a Corporate Bank newly created in 2019, a leading Private Bank, a focused investment bank and in asset management. We provide financial services to companies, governments, institutional investors, small and medium-sized businesses and private individuals. Deutsche Bank was founded in 1870 to accompany German businesses into the world, and has worked across borders ever since. Useful links: Jobs https://www.db.com/careers. Netiquette at https://www.db.com/netiquette. Data protection policy https://www.db.com/DataProtection. Imprint https://www.db.com/imprint.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 74,237
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-mutual.jpeg
Old Mutual
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-bank.jpeg
Deutsche Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Old Mutual
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Deutsche Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Old Mutual in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deutsche Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Old Mutual (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Old Mutual cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Deutsche Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deutsche Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/old-mutual.jpeg
Old Mutual
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/deutsche-bank.jpeg
Deutsche Bank
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Access, Logical Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Initial Access Broker
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Old Mutual company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Deutsche Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Deutsche Bank company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Old Mutual company has not reported any.

In the current year, Deutsche Bank company and Old Mutual company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Deutsche Bank company nor Old Mutual company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Deutsche Bank company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Old Mutual company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Deutsche Bank company nor Old Mutual company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Old Mutual company nor Deutsche Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Deutsche Bank company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Old Mutual company.

Deutsche Bank company employs more people globally than Old Mutual company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Old Mutual nor Deutsche Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N