Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OktaOkta
VS
Xiaomi TechnologyXiaomi Technology
Okta

Okta

100 1st St, San Francisco, 94105, US

Last Update: 04/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.okta.com
336/1000Critical

Okta secures AI. Okta is The World’s Identity Company. Freeing everyone to safely use any technology—anywhere, on any device or app.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:7,013
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
6
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
3
Xiaomi Technology

Xiaomi Technology

No. 33 Xi erqi Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing,100085,China, Beijing, CN

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.mi.com/global
807/1000Good

Xiaomi Corporation was founded in April 2010 and listed on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on July 9, 2018 (1810.HK). Xiaomi is a consumer electronics and smart manufacturing company with smartphones and smart hardware connected by an IoT platform at its ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:23,777
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Okta

Okta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Xiaomi Technology

Xiaomi Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Okta has 466.04% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Xiaomi Technology has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Okta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Okta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Xiaomi Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xiaomi Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Okta

Okta

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ADT1777286874
🔒 Incident : Breach
SALLASAMDSNOSONOKT1773153462
Xiaomi Technology

Xiaomi Technology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OPPXIAAND1772310272
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
XIA1768816067
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
XIA605062425

FAQ

Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Okta company and Xiaomi Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Okta and Xiaomi Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Okta and Xiaomi Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Okta or Xiaomi Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Okta or Xiaomi Technology ?
Between Okta and Xiaomi Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Okta and Xiaomi Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57990
SUMMARY

Files or directories accessible to external parties in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57989
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-57978
SUMMARY

Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-17497
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 grants the Tauri shell plugin shell:allow-execute capability for bash, python, and python3 with arbitrary arguments in the default desktop capabilities. JavaScript running in the application webview can therefore invoke plugin:shell|execute to run attacker-controlled operating system commands with the privileges of the NoteGen process. In combination with script execution in the webview (for example via chat XSS), this enables full remote code execution on the user's machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-17496
SUMMARY

NoteGen before 0.32.0 renders AI chat responses with markdown-it configured with html:true and injects the result into the DOM via dangerouslySetInnerHTML in chat-preview, without HTML sanitization and with CSP set to null. Attacker-controlled content that reaches the model prompt (for example a malicious skill REFERENCE.md that instructs the model to emit HTML) can cause the model response to include executable markup such as an img onerror handler. When the user views the chat response, that markup runs as JavaScript in the privileged Tauri webview, enabling arbitrary script execution in the application context (cross-site scripting).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-26
UPDATED
Date2026-07-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8