Comparison Overview

Oklahoma City Museum of Art

VS

American Museum of Science and Energy

Oklahoma City Museum of Art

415 Couch Drive, Oklahoma City, 73102, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The Oklahoma City Museum of Art is one of the leading arts institutions in the region. The Museum presents a dynamic range of exhibitions organized from prestigious museums and collections throughout the world. The Museum’s own diverse collection features highlights from North America, Europe, and Asia, with particular strengths in American art and postwar abstraction. The permanent collection also boasts one of the world’s largest public collections of Dale Chihuly glass, a major collection of photography by Brett Weston, and the definitive museum collection of works by the Washington Color painter Paul Reed. The Museum’s renowned Samuel Roberts Noble Theater screens the finest international, independent, documentary, and classic films. Museum amenities include the Museum Store and the Roof Terrace. The Oklahoma City Museum of Art is accredited by the American Alliance of Museums and is a member of the Association of Art Museum Directors. The Museum serves over 125,000 visitors annually from all fifty states and thirty foreign countries.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

American Museum of Science and Energy

300 S. Tulane Ave, Oak Ridge, TN, 37830, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The American Museum of Science and Energy, AMSE, was opened in conjunction with the opening of the gates to Oak Ridge, the secret city that was built to enrich uranium for the bomb dropped on Hiroshima during WWII. The museum tells the history of Oak Ridge's role during the Manhattan Project.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oklahoma-city-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oklahoma City Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-museum-of-science-and-energy.jpeg
American Museum of Science and Energy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oklahoma City Museum of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
American Museum of Science and Energy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oklahoma City Museum of Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Museum of Science and Energy in 2026.

Incident History — Oklahoma City Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oklahoma City Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — American Museum of Science and Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Museum of Science and Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oklahoma-city-museum-of-art.jpeg
Oklahoma City Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-museum-of-science-and-energy.jpeg
American Museum of Science and Energy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Museum of Science and Energy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oklahoma City Museum of Art company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, American Museum of Science and Energy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Oklahoma City Museum of Art company.

In the current year, American Museum of Science and Energy company and Oklahoma City Museum of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither American Museum of Science and Energy company nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither American Museum of Science and Energy company nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither American Museum of Science and Energy company nor Oklahoma City Museum of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art company nor American Museum of Science and Energy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art company nor American Museum of Science and Energy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Oklahoma City Museum of Art company employs more people globally than American Museum of Science and Energy company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oklahoma City Museum of Art nor American Museum of Science and Energy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H