Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OIM HondurasOIM Honduras
VS
UNHCR, the UN Refugee AgencyUNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency
OIM Honduras

OIM Honduras

11101, Tegucigalpa, HN

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Organización Internacional para las Migraciones (OIM) en Honduras 🇭🇳 Trabajamos para garantizar los derechos de todas las personas migrantes.

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:80
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

94, rue de Montbrillant, Geneva, 1202, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://unh.cr/6724adac9
808/1000Good

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, is a global organisation dedicated to saving lives, protecting rights and building a better future for people forced to flee their homes because of conflict and persecution. We lead international action to protect refugees, forcibly displa...

NAICS:92812
NAICS Definition:International Affairs
Employees:20,552
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OIM Honduras

OIM Honduras

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OIM Honduras in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs International Affairs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OIM Honduras (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OIM Honduras cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OIM Honduras

OIM Honduras

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OIM Honduras company and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OIM Honduras and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OIM Honduras and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OIM Honduras or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OIM Honduras or UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency ?
Between OIM Honduras and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OIM Honduras and UNHCR, the UN Refugee Agency, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9