Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OhioHealth Rehabilitation HospitalOhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital
VS
NYC Health + HospitalsNYC Health + Hospitals
OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital

OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital

N/A

Last Update: 29/10/2025

View Profile
763/1000Fair

OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital provides highly specialized care, advanced treatment and leading-edge technologies that help individuals like you rebuild your life following injury or illness.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
NYC Health + Hospitals

NYC Health + Hospitals

50 Water St., New York, NY, US, 10004

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
629/1000Poor

NYC Health + Hospitals is the nation’s largest public health care delivery system. We are an integrated network of hospitals, trauma centers, neighborhood health centers, nursing homes, and post-acute care centers. We are a home care agency and a health plan, MetroPlus....

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:15,924
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital

OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NYC Health + Hospitals

NYC Health + Hospitals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

NYC Health + Hospitals has 8.26% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NYC Health + Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NYC Health + Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital

OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
NYC Health + Hospitals

NYC Health + Hospitals

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NYC1774664917
🔒 Incident : Breach
NYC1773398395
🔒 Incident : Breach
NYC1779194396

FAQ

Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital company and NYC Health + Hospitals company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital and NYC Health + Hospitals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital and NYC Health + Hospitals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital or NYC Health + Hospitals ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital or NYC Health + Hospitals ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital and NYC Health + Hospitals, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OhioHealth Rehabilitation Hospital and NYC Health + Hospitals, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44654
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-44653
SUMMARY

LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-42507
SUMMARY

When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-42504
SUMMARY

Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-41412
SUMMARY

alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-02
UPDATED
Date2026-06-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2