Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ohio LivingOhio Living
VS
UMass Memorial HealthUMass Memorial Health
Ohio Living

Ohio Living

9200 Worthington Rd, Westerville, 43082, US

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ohioliving.org
704/1000Moderate

Ohio Living is one of the largest and most experienced not-for-profit, multi-site senior living organizations. With 11 life plan communities (including independent living, assisted lived, skilled rehabilitation, memory care and long-term nursing), Ohio Living Home Healt...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:878
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
UMass Memorial Health

UMass Memorial Health

Worcester, Massachusetts, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ummhealth.org
776/1000Fair

UMass Memorial Health is the health and wellness partner of the people of Central Massachusetts. Through pain and pandemics, our commitment to our communities never wanes. We use knowledge and innovation to create breakthrough medicine, to create jobs, and to make life ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,678
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ohio Living

Ohio Living

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UMass Memorial Health

UMass Memorial Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Ohio Living has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UMass Memorial Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ohio Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ohio Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UMass Memorial Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UMass Memorial Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ohio Living

Ohio Living

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OHI1781656098
UMass Memorial Health

UMass Memorial Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ohio Living company and UMass Memorial Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ohio Living and UMass Memorial Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ohio Living and UMass Memorial Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ohio Living or UMass Memorial Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ohio Living or UMass Memorial Health ?
Between Ohio Living and UMass Memorial Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ohio Living and UMass Memorial Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2