Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OGASCOOGASCO
VS
ShellShell
OGASCO

OGASCO

54D1 - Industrial City of Abu Dhabi (ICAD1), Abu Dhabi - Industrial city of Abu Dhabi, 53266, AE

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ogasco.ae
745/1000Moderate

OGASCO is one of the leading providers of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) services among the oil and gas industry in the middle east region since our establishment in 1994, with a strong commitment to quality and track record of successful projects with...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:171
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Shell

Shell

York Road, London, SE1 7NA, GB

Last Update: 23/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.shell.com
737/1000Moderate

Shell is a global group of energy and petrochemical companies, employing 96,000 people across 70+ countries. We serve around 1 million commercial and industrial customers, and around 33 million customers daily at our Shell-branded retail service stations. Our purpose i...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:213,214
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OGASCO

OGASCO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Shell

Shell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OGASCO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

Shell has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - OGASCO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OGASCO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Shell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Shell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OGASCO

OGASCO

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Shell

Shell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCDCITSHEVODVERATTGITCURAUSVMW1787509645
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PHISHE1786703569
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PTC1774441546

FAQ

Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OGASCO company and Shell company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OGASCO and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OGASCO and Shell, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OGASCO or Shell ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OGASCO or Shell ?
Between OGASCO and Shell, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OGASCO and Shell, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA