Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OECOEC
VS
Red HatRed Hat
OEC

OEC

3600 Embassy Pkwy, Fairlawn, Ohio, US, 44333

Last Update: 09/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.oeconnection.com
707/1000Moderate

Playing our part right from the start. Back in 2000, OEMs were facing a huge hurdle selling parts into dealerships, mechanical shops, and collision shops. Every transaction was handled manually, either by phone or fax, which left the market desperate for a faster, more...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:1,839
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Red Hat

Red Hat

100 E. Davie St., Raleigh, NC, US, 27601

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.redhat.com
695/1000Weak

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, hybrid cloud, edge, and Kubernetes technologies. We hire creative, passionate people who are ready to contribute their idea...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:19,335
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OEC

OEC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Red Hat

Red Hat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

OEC has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Hat in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OEC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OEC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Red Hat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Hat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OEC

OEC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OEC1781015514
Red Hat

Red Hat

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RED4732847100725
🔒 Incident : Breach
RED4292342100825
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
RED1694016100125

FAQ

Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OEC company and Red Hat company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OEC and Red Hat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OEC and Red Hat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OEC or Red Hat ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OEC or Red Hat ?
Between OEC and Red Hat, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OEC and Red Hat, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA