Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Odido NederlandOdido Nederland
VS
Millicom (Tigo)Millicom (Tigo)
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland

Waldorpstraat 60, The Hague, South Holland, NL, 2521 CC

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.odido.nl
656/1000Weak

Samen zijn we Odido Hallo, Odido hier. Je provider voor Mobiel, Glasvezel en TV. En met bijna 2.000 collega’s laten we zien dat telecom anders kan. Menselijker. Want technologie is er voor iedereen. Waar je ook vandaan komt, waar je ook heengaat. Onze naam kan je van ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:2,339
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (Tigo)

2 Rue du Fort Bourbon, Luxembourg, 1249, LU

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.millicom.com
790/1000Fair

Millicom (NASDAQ U.S.: TIGO, Nasdaq) is a leading provider of fixed and mobile telecommunications services in Latin America. Through our TIGO® and Tigo Business® brands, we provide a wide range of digital services and products, including TIGO Money for mobile financial ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:29,169
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (Tigo)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Odido Nederland has 47.09% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Millicom (Tigo) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Odido Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odido Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Millicom (Tigo) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Millicom (Tigo) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EURODI1770907059
🔒 Incident : Breach
ODI1771014852
Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (Tigo)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Odido Nederland and Millicom (Tigo), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Odido Nederland and Millicom (Tigo), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Odido Nederland or Millicom (Tigo) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Odido Nederland or Millicom (Tigo) ?
Between Odido Nederland and Millicom (Tigo), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Odido Nederland and Millicom (Tigo), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2