Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Odido NederlandOdido Nederland
VS
EricssonEricsson
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland

Waldorpstraat 60, The Hague, 2521 CC, NL

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.odido.nl
603/1000Poor

Samen zijn we Odido Hallo, Odido hier. Je provider voor Mobiel, Glasvezel en TV. En met bijna 2.000 collega’s laten we zien dat telecom anders kan. Menselijker. Want technologie is er voor iedereen. Waar je ook vandaan komt, waar je ook heengaat. Onze naam kan je van ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:2,363
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
Ericsson

Ericsson

Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.ericsson.com
568/1000Very Poor

The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological s...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:107,243
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ericsson

Ericsson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Odido Nederland has 10.5% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Ericsson has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Odido Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odido Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ericsson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ericsson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Odido Nederland

Odido Nederland

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ODI1790634436
🔒 Incident : Breach
EURODI1770907059
🔒 Incident : Breach
ODI1771014852
Ericsson

Ericsson

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERI1773189089
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ERIDEFJOHROLVID1772180734
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOHROLERI1772202424

FAQ

Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Odido Nederland company and Ericsson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Odido Nederland and Ericsson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Odido Nederland and Ericsson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Odido Nederland or Ericsson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Odido Nederland or Ericsson ?
Between Odido Nederland and Ericsson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Odido Nederland and Ericsson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA