Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Octapharma Plasma, Inc.Octapharma Plasma, Inc.
VS
Johnson & Johnson Innovative MedicineJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

10644 Westlake Drive, Charlotte, 28273, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
385/1000Critical

About Us: Octapharma Plasma, Inc. helps change lives through the incredible power of plasma donation. Backed by a global organization and supported by a dedicated team of more than 5,000 employees across the United States, we operate over 175 centers nationwide. Our mis...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:3,100
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

N/A

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
807/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, we innovate with purpose, to lead where medicine is going. The experiences of patients around the world inform and inspire our science-based innovations, which continue to change and save lives. Applying rigorous science with co...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:37,729
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Octapharma Plasma, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Octapharma Plasma, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Octapharma Plasma, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

Octapharma Plasma, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OCT2232822111325
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
OCT410080825
🔒 Incident : Breach
OCT0732507091625
Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. company and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Octapharma Plasma, Inc. or Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Octapharma Plasma, Inc. or Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Octapharma Plasma, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2