Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ocado RetailOcado Retail
VS
JYSKJYSK
Ocado Retail

Ocado Retail

Apollo Court, 2 Bishop Square, Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield, AL10 9EX, GB

Last Update: 08/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://ocadoretail.com
726/1000Moderate

We’re the world’s dedicated online supermarket, committed to bringing more of what matters to our customers: unbeatable choice, unrivalled service, reassuringly good value.

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:2,227
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
JYSK

JYSK

Sødalsparken 18, Brabrand, 8220, DK

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.jysk.com
795/1000Fair

JYSK is an international home furnishing retailer with Scandinavian roots that makes it easy to furnish every room in any home and garden. JYSK delivers a great Scandinavian offer for everyone within sleeping and living. We are a global retail chain of stores and web ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,346
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ocado Retail

Ocado Retail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JYSK

JYSK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ocado Retail in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JYSK in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ocado Retail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ocado Retail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JYSK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JYSK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ocado Retail

Ocado Retail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAROCA1780944395
JYSK

JYSK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ocado Retail company and JYSK company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ocado Retail and JYSK, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ocado Retail and JYSK, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ocado Retail or JYSK ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ocado Retail or JYSK ?
Between Ocado Retail and JYSK, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ocado Retail and JYSK, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9