Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

OC TranspoOC Transpo
VS
RATPgroupRATPgroup
OC Transpo

OC Transpo

N/A

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://octranspo.com
739/1000Moderate

OC Transpo moves people in Canada’s national capital, and we are proud to be your choice to get there. With a population of over one million residents and covering an area of more than 2,790 square kilometres, Ottawa is one of the largest cities in Canada. We provide t...

NAICS:4851
NAICS Definition:Urban Transit Systems
Employees:385
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

54 Quai de la Rapée PARIS, 75012, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ratpgroup.com
772/1000Fair

The RATP Group is the world's third largest public transport company, carrying 12 million people every day in France and around the world. It boasts unrivalled experience in design, project management, operation and maintenance of all types of urban and suburban transpo...

NAICS:4851
NAICS Definition:Urban Transit Systems
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
OC Transpo

OC Transpo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OC Transpo in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATPgroup in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - OC Transpo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OC Transpo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RATPgroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATPgroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
OC Transpo

OC Transpo

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OCT244121122
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between OC Transpo company and RATPgroup company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between OC Transpo and RATPgroup, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between OC Transpo and RATPgroup, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - OC Transpo or RATPgroup ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - OC Transpo or RATPgroup ?
Between OC Transpo and RATPgroup, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between OC Transpo and RATPgroup, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3