Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal HealthLaborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health
VS
Zimmer BiometZimmer Biomet
Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health

Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health

747 West 4170 South, Murray, 84123, US

Last Update: 21/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.laborie.com/
761/1000Fair

Clinical Innovations was acquired by Laborie in Feb 2020 and forms a new business unit specifically focused on medical device solutions in Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatal Health. We are passionate about helping every mother and every newborn and to ensure they go ho...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet

345 East Main Street, P.O. Box 708, Warsaw, Indiana, US, 46580

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zimmerbiomet.com
799/1000Fair

Zimmer Biomet is a global medical technology leader with a comprehensive portfolio designed to maximize mobility and improve health. We advance our mission to alleviate pain and improve the quality of life for patients around the world with our innovative products and s...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:18,660
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health

Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zimmer Biomet in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zimmer Biomet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zimmer Biomet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health

Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Zimmer Biomet

Zimmer Biomet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health company and Zimmer Biomet company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health and Zimmer Biomet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health and Zimmer Biomet, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health or Zimmer Biomet ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health or Zimmer Biomet ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health and Zimmer Biomet, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Laborie OBGYN & Neonatal Health and Zimmer Biomet, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1