Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Obot AIObot AI
VS
bigbasketbigbasket
Obot AI

Obot AI

Cupertino, US

Last Update: 27/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.obot.ai
695/1000Weak

MCPs are becoming the backbone of AI integration. Without a control layer, organizations risk shadow infrastructure, data leaks, and lost productivity. Obot's MCP Gateway helps enterprises accelerate adoption and stay in control - before the chaos spreads.

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
bigbasket

bigbasket

Fairway Business Park, Embassy Golf Links Road, Challaghatta, Bangalore, 560071, IN

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bigbasket.com
787/1000Fair

Starting our journey in 2011, today, bigbasket - a Tata Enterprise is India’s largest online supermarket with over 13 million customers and a presence in 60+ cities & towns. With our presence spanning the entire spectrum of consumer needs, we operate through a range of ...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:20,685
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Obot AI

Obot AI

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
bigbasket

bigbasket

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Obot AI has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for bigbasket in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Obot AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Obot AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - bigbasket (X = Date, Y = Severity)

bigbasket cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Obot AI

Obot AI

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
OBOVLLFAS1779892255
🔒 Incident : Breach
OBO1778495141
bigbasket

bigbasket

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Obot AI company and bigbasket company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Obot AI and bigbasket, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Obot AI and bigbasket, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Obot AI or bigbasket ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Obot AI or bigbasket ?
Between Obot AI and bigbasket, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Obot AI and bigbasket, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3