Comparison Overview
Oasis Fashion

Oasis Fashion
Level 5, Euston Tower, 286 Euston Road, London, London, NW1 3DP, GB
Last Update: 20/05/2026
We’re Oasis, the renowned British fashion brand you know, love and live. Since launching in 1991, we’ve created easy, trend led, effortless pieces that are made for modern life. Explore our latest collection and discover hard-working, elevated feminine designs for busy...

Bata Group
Avenue d'ouchy 61, Lausanne, 1006, CH
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The Bata Group is one of the world's leading manufacturers and retailers of quality footwear. A global concern with more than 32,000 employees, 21 production facilities, over 5,300 stores in more than 70 countries across the globe, Bata has been providing the best shoes...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Oasis Fashion







Bata Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Oasis Fashion in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bata Group in 2026.
Incident History - Oasis Fashion (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Oasis Fashion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Bata Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bata Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Oasis Fashion

Bata Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.