Comparison Overview
Oakley

Oakley
1 Icon, Foothill Ranch, 92610, US
Last Update: 03/02/2026
Together we’re cultivating a safe and inclusive environment where all voices can evoke meaningful and purposeful change. When you’re free to be the best version of yourself is when you can Be Who You Are. With our brand, you’ll be part of a team that’s influencing athl...

Tailored Brands, Inc.
6380 Rogerdale Rd, Houston, 77072, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Our Purpose: We help people love the way they look and feel for their most important moments. Our Values: • Customer-First - We put customers at the center of every decision • Win Together - We rally together to achieve common goals • Better Every Day - We strive for e...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Oakley







Tailored Brands, Inc.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Oakley in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Tailored Brands, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Oakley (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Oakley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Tailored Brands, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tailored Brands, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Oakley

Tailored Brands, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.