Comparison Overview
City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General
City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General
250 Frank H Ogawa Plaza, Oakland, 94612, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The OIG is the monitoring and auditing arm of the Oakland Police Commission. The OIG is responsible for monitoring the Oakland Police Department’s (OPD) compliance with policies, procedures, and laws intended to further strengthen the City’s ability to decrease instance...
United States Postal Service
475 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W., Washington, D.C., US, 20260
Last Update: 02/08/2026
As the United States Postal Service continues its evolution as a forward-thinking, fast-acting company capable of providing quality products and services for its customers, it continues to remember and celebrate its roots as the first national network of communications ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General
United States Postal Service
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
United States Postal Service has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General (X = Date, Y = Severity)
City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - United States Postal Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)
United States Postal Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
City of Oakland, Office of the Inspector General
United States Postal Service
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.