Comparison Overview

Oak View Group

VS

Electronic Arts (EA)

Oak View Group

5050 S Syracuse St., None, Greenwood Village, CO, US, 80237
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749

We are here to be a POSITIVE DISRUPTION to business as usual in the sports and live entertainment, and hospitality industries.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 4,166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Electronic Arts (EA)

209 Redwood Shores Pkwy, Redwood City, CA, US, 94065
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Electronic Arts creates next-level entertainment experiences that inspire players and fans around the world. Here, everyone is part of the story. Part of a community that connects across the globe. A team where creativity thrives, new perspectives are invited, and ideas matter. Regardless of your role, team, or location, this is a place where everyone makes play happen. Join us.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 32,473
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oak-view-group.jpeg
Oak View Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-arts.jpeg
Electronic Arts (EA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oak View Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Electronic Arts (EA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oak View Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Electronic Arts (EA) in 2025.

Incident History — Oak View Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oak View Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Electronic Arts (EA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Electronic Arts (EA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oak-view-group.jpeg
Oak View Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/electronic-arts.jpeg
Electronic Arts (EA)
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Theft (Authentication Cookies), Social Engineering, Internal Network Access via Slack
Motivation: Financial Gain (Extortion), Data Monetization (Failed Sale)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Electronic Arts (EA) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oak View Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Electronic Arts (EA) company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Oak View Group company.

In the current year, Electronic Arts (EA) company and Oak View Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Electronic Arts (EA) company nor Oak View Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Electronic Arts (EA) company and Oak View Group company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Electronic Arts (EA) company nor Oak View Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oak View Group company nor Electronic Arts (EA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oak View Group company nor Electronic Arts (EA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Electronic Arts (EA) company employs more people globally than Oak View Group company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Electronic Arts (EA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X