Comparison Overview

Oak View Group

VS

Cinemark

Oak View Group

5050 S Syracuse St., None, Greenwood Village, CO, US, 80237
Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 700 and 749

We are here to be a POSITIVE DISRUPTION to business as usual in the sports and live entertainment, and hospitality industries.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 4,166
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Cinemark

3900 Dallas Parkway, Plano, TX, 75093, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Headquartered in Plano, TX, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. provides premium out-of-home entertainment experiences as one of the largest and most influential theatrical exhibition companies in the world with 497 theatres and 5,653 screens in the U.S. and Latin America as of December 31, 2024. • Our circuit is the third largest in the U.S. with 304 theatres and 4,255 screens in 42 states. • We ranked either #1 or #2 in box office revenues in 21 of our top 25 markets. • We are one of the most geographically diverse circuits in Latin America with 193 theatres and 1,398 screens in 13 countries. • We had a presence in 15 of the top 20 metropolitan cities in South and Central America.

NAICS: 71
NAICS Definition: Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees: 11,258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oak-view-group.jpeg
Oak View Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Oak View Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cinemark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Oak View Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cinemark in 2025.

Incident History — Oak View Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Oak View Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cinemark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cinemark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oak-view-group.jpeg
Oak View Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cinemark.jpeg
Cinemark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cinemark company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Oak View Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Oak View Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cinemark company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cinemark company and Oak View Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cinemark company nor Oak View Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Oak View Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cinemark company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cinemark company nor Oak View Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Oak View Group company nor Cinemark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Oak View Group company nor Cinemark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cinemark company employs more people globally than Oak View Group company, reflecting its scale as a Entertainment Providers.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Oak View Group nor Cinemark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X