Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

o2 Business Solutionso2 Business Solutions
VS
AT&TAT&T
o2 Business Solutions

o2 Business Solutions

Georg-Brauchle-Ring 50, München, 80992, DE

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.o2business.de
754/1000Fair

o2 Business Solutions – Ihr Partner für digitale Vernetzung Die digitale Zukunft braucht sichere und skalierbare Lösungen. o2 Business Solutions bietet Unternehmen innovative Technologien für IoT, 5G Campus Networks, SD-WAN, Cybersecurity, Data Center Housing und Automa...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AT&T

AT&T

208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US

Last Update: 26/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.att.com
100/1000Critical

We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:194,164
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
12
Known data breaches
27
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
o2 Business Solutions

o2 Business Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AT&T

AT&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for o2 Business Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

AT&T has 1076.47% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - o2 Business Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

o2 Business Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
o2 Business Solutions

o2 Business Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AT&T

AT&T

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SNOVERMICATTDLI1790382515
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ATT1788999838
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MCDCITSHEVODVERATTGITCURAUSVMW1787509645

FAQ

Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between o2 Business Solutions company and AT&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between o2 Business Solutions and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between o2 Business Solutions and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - o2 Business Solutions or AT&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - o2 Business Solutions or AT&T ?
Between o2 Business Solutions and AT&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between o2 Business Solutions and AT&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103047
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-103046
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension: before 1.46.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-103045
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Refreshed skin allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - Refreshed skin: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-103044
SUMMARY

XML injection (aka blind XPath injection) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension allows XML Injection. This issue affects Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-103043
SUMMARY

anchorme through 3.0.8 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in the IPv6 host extraction regex due to catastrophic backtracking. Attackers can supply specially crafted input strings with repeated patterns to cause exponential regex engine backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop and denying service to other requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-29
UPDATED
Date2026-09-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9