Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)
VS
TelenorTelenor
o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

Georg-Brauchle-Ring 50, München, Bayern, 80992, DE

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.o2business.de
752/1000Fair

Mehr als Mobilfunk, DSL, Cloud-Telefonie oder 5G-Lösungen - wir nehmen Business persönlich. Damit Sie erfolgreich sind. Wir freuen uns auf eine offene, partnerschaftliche Kommunikation mit Ihnen. Unsere Netiquette finden Sie unter https://b.o2.de/SoMe-Netiquette Daten...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:68
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Telenor

Telenor

Snarøyveien 30, Fornebu, NO, 1331

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telenor.com/
798/1000Fair

EMPOWERING SOCIETIES. CONNECTING YOU TO WHAT MATTERS MOST. Telenor Group is a leading telecommunications company across the Nordics and Asia with 158 million subscribers and annual sales of around NOK 99 billions (2022).  We are committed to responsible business condu...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:22,731
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Telenor

Telenor

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telenor in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Telenor (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telenor cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Telenor

Telenor

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Telenor company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Telenor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Telenor, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) or Telenor ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) or Telenor ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Telenor, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Telenor, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2