Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)
VS
EricssonEricsson
o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

Georg-Brauchle-Ring 50, München, Bayern, 80992, DE

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.o2business.de
752/1000Fair

Mehr als Mobilfunk, DSL, Cloud-Telefonie oder 5G-Lösungen - wir nehmen Business persönlich. Damit Sie erfolgreich sind. Wir freuen uns auf eine offene, partnerschaftliche Kommunikation mit Ihnen. Unsere Netiquette finden Sie unter https://b.o2.de/SoMe-Netiquette Daten...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:68
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ericsson

Ericsson

Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.ericsson.com
568/1000Very Poor

The future of mobile isn’t on the horizon, it’s happening now. At Ericsson, we’re building the foundation for an open network ecosystem where industries, developers, and enterprises thrive. The convergence of 5G, AI, cloud, and network APIs isn’t just a technological s...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:107,243
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ericsson

Ericsson

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Ericsson has 188.46% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ericsson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ericsson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

o2 Business (Telefónica Germany)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ericsson

Ericsson

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ERI1773189089
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ERIDEFJOHROLVID1772180734
🔒 Incident : Breach
JOHROLERI1772202424

FAQ

Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) company and Ericsson company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Ericsson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Ericsson, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) or Ericsson ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) or Ericsson ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Ericsson, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between o2 Business (Telefónica Germany) and Ericsson, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8