Comparison Overview

O Boticário

VS

Coty

O Boticário

Av. Rui Barbosa, 4.110, Parque das Fontes,, São José dos Pinhais, PR, 83.050-010, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

A beleza transforma, encanta, conquista e também pode ser conquistada. Eis o ideal de beleza que O Boticário multiplica com seus produtos, lojas e em sua relação com o público. Desde 1977, O Boticário soma inspiração, ousadia, inovação e qualidade, despertando o respeito do mercado, a confiança dos parceiros e a admiração dos consumidores. Conheça mais sobre O Boticário: Instagram: http://instagram.com/oboticario Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/oboticario Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/boticario Twitter: http://twitter.com/oboticario Loja Online: www.boticario.com.br

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 19,719
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coty

Buitenveldertselaan 3-5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Since 1904, Coty has fearlessly pioneered innovation across the beauty industry. We have a reputation for breaking new ground; a history of ‘firsts’ and ‘bests’ that has laid the foundation for the industry as we know it today. For over a century, our brands have been empowering people to express themselves and create their own vision of beauty. It’s a legacy we’re proud to own and grow. We work hand-in-hand with our people, our partners and our customers. Together, we unleash every vision of beauty. We stand for the beauty of diversity and the diversity of beauty - celebrating and inspiring all the expressions of beauty that exist and that will exist. We honor you, and we honor our planet. We create Beauty That Lasts. A beauty that is both good to people and the world. Our mission is to create a forward thinking beauty; Products that provide new, innovative and simply better science based solutions. Let’s keep making over the beauty world TOGETHER.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 11,158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-boticario.jpeg
O Boticário
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
O Boticário
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coty
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for O Boticário in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coty in 2025.

Incident History — O Boticário (X = Date, Y = Severity)

O Boticário cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/o-boticario.jpeg
O Boticário
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

O Boticário company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coty company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Coty company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas O Boticário company has not reported any.

In the current year, Coty company and O Boticário company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coty company nor O Boticário company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Coty company has disclosed at least one data breach, while O Boticário company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Coty company nor O Boticário company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither O Boticário company nor Coty company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

O Boticário company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Coty company.

O Boticário company employs more people globally than Coty company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds HIPAA certification.

Neither O Boticário nor Coty holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N