Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NZ Transport Agency Waka KotahiNZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi
VS
Københavns KommuneKøbenhavns Kommune
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi

44 Bowen Street, Wellington, WGN, NZ, 6011

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nzta.govt.nz/
757/1000Fair

We develop and maintain New Zealand’s land transport system, connecting people, products, and places across the country. We're responsible for promoting road safety, managing the country's state highways, and regulating the land transport system, including licensing dri...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,811
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Københavns Kommune

Københavns Kommune

Rådhuset, København V, 1599, DK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://kk.dk
780/1000Fair

Københavns Kommune er Danmarks største arbejdsplads med ca. 45.000 medarbejdere. Vi udvikler hovedstaden og servicerer over 500.000 københavnere. Vores mål er at fastholde og udvikle København som en af verdens bedste byer at bo i – og skabe øget vækst gennem viden, inn...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,892
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Københavns Kommune

Københavns Kommune

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Københavns Kommune in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Københavns Kommune (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Københavns Kommune cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi

NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
WAK16713423
Københavns Kommune

Københavns Kommune

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi company and Københavns Kommune company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi and Københavns Kommune, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi and Københavns Kommune, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi or Københavns Kommune ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi or Københavns Kommune ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi and Københavns Kommune, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi and Københavns Kommune, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1