Comparison Overview

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

VS

RATPgroup

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

2 Broadway, New York, 10004, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is North America's largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people in the 5,000-square-mile area fanning out from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. The MTA comprises six agencies: MTA New York City Transit, MTA Bus Company, MTA Long Island Rail Road, MTA Metro-North Railroad, MTA Bridges and Tunnels, and MTA Construction & Development. The MTA network has the nation’s largest bus fleet and more subway and commuter rail cars than all other U.S. transit systems combined. It provides around 2.6 billion trips each year, accounting for about one-third of the nation’s mass transit users and two-thirds of its commuter rail passengers. MTA Bridges and Tunnels, which recorded a record 329 million crossings in 2019, carries more vehicles than any other bridge and tunnel authority in the nation. Interested in doing great work that impacts the lives of millions every day? Apply for a position today. You’ll not only have an opportunity to bring your skills to a mission in which you can take pride, you’ll enjoy first-class benefits including pension and 401(k) retirement savings plans, Wellness programs, Insurance plans, Healthcare plans, a generous vacation and leave package, and medical coverage for spouses, domestic partners, and dependents. The MTA’s provision of safe, clean, efficient public transportation is the lifeblood of the New York City area.

NAICS: 4851
NAICS Definition: Urban Transit Systems
Employees: 20,625
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

RATPgroup

54 Quai de la Rapée PARIS, 75012, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

The RATP Group is the world's third largest public transport company, carrying 12 million people every day in France and around the world. It boasts unrivalled experience in design, project management, operation and maintenance of all types of urban and suburban transport, making it an industry leader called upon around the globe for its expertise. The RATP Group already operates in 15 countries through 100 subsidiaries and is stepping up its international expansion through some major projects worldwide. The RATP Group is also a strong proponent of sustainable mobility. It has the know-how to meet new service quality challenges by anticipating new passenger expectations in terms of information, accessibility, safety, regularity and service innovation. The RATP Group at a glance: - 71,000 employees - Operations in 15 countries Specialisations: Operation, maintenance and engineering of passenger transport networks: urban and suburban transport (train, metro, tramway, bus)

NAICS: 4851
NAICS Definition: Urban Transit Systems
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nymta.jpeg
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ratp.jpeg
RATPgroup
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RATPgroup
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Transportation Authority in 2025.

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATPgroup in 2025.

Incident History — Metropolitan Transportation Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Transportation Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RATPgroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATPgroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nymta.jpeg
Metropolitan Transportation Authority
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ratp.jpeg
RATPgroup
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metropolitan Transportation Authority company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RATPgroup company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas RATPgroup company has not reported any.

In the current year, RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RATPgroup company nor Metropolitan Transportation Authority company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RATPgroup company nor Metropolitan Transportation Authority company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while RATPgroup company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority company nor RATPgroup company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to RATPgroup company.

Metropolitan Transportation Authority company employs more people globally than RATPgroup company, reflecting its scale as a Urban Transit Services.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metropolitan Transportation Authority nor RATPgroup holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X