Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NXP Developer ZoneNXP Developer Zone
VS
AMDAMD
NXP Developer Zone

NXP Developer Zone

High Tech Campus 60, Eindhoven, 5656, NL

Last Update: 18/02/2026

View Profile

The NXP Developer Zone is your go-to destination for in-depth technical content, product innovations and ecosystem collaborations. This channel is designed for engineers and developers looking for the latest NXP technical insights, partner ecosystem and training oppor...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AMD

AMD

2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amd.com
784/1000Fair

We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technology to enrich our industry, our communities, and the world. Our mission is to build great products that accelerate next-generation computing experiences – the building blocks for the data center, artificial intelli...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:47,977
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NXP Developer Zone

NXP Developer Zone

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AMD

AMD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NXP Developer Zone in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AMD has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NXP Developer Zone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NXP Developer Zone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AMD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NXP Developer Zone

NXP Developer Zone

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AMD

AMD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
NVIAMD1789014785
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMDLIN1783614518
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1781267811

FAQ

Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NXP Developer Zone company and AMD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NXP Developer Zone and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NXP Developer Zone and AMD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NXP Developer Zone or AMD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NXP Developer Zone or AMD ?
Between NXP Developer Zone and AMD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NXP Developer Zone and AMD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8