Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

State of Nevada, Governor's Technology OfficeState of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office
VS
Comunidad de MadridComunidad de Madrid
State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office

State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office

Carson City, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://it.nv.gov
100/1000Critical

Our vision is driven by pioneering technological advancements, underpinned by a spirit of collaborative governance. We are committed to delivering technological services and solutions that resonate with the needs of the modern era. Our mission is clear-cut: to efficien...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:39
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Comunidad de Madrid

Comunidad de Madrid

Plaza de la Puerta del Sol, 7, Madrid, 28013, ES

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
787/1000Fair

Si necesitas información general y especializada sobre los servicios públicos madrileños puedes llamar al teléfono de Atención al Ciudadano 012. En la Comunidad de Madrid estamos encantados de recibir comentarios y favorecer el diálogo, por eso te proponemos unas nor...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:24,087
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office

State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Comunidad de Madrid

Comunidad de Madrid

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Comunidad de Madrid in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Comunidad de Madrid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Comunidad de Madrid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office

State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NV-506090325
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NV-1862018091325
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NV-2862228110625
Comunidad de Madrid

Comunidad de Madrid

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office company and Comunidad de Madrid company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office and Comunidad de Madrid, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office and Comunidad de Madrid, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office or Comunidad de Madrid ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office or Comunidad de Madrid ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office and Comunidad de Madrid, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between State of Nevada, Governor's Technology Office and Comunidad de Madrid, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA