Comparison Overview
IFT Nutrition Division

IFT Nutrition Division
undefined, Chicago, MI, undefined, US
Last Update: 10/05/2026
Join the discussion and connect with colleagues and nutrition division leaders on applied research, science, and market trends associated with the development of foods to maintain and improve health.

Mars
6885 Elm St, McLean, Virginia, US, 22101
Last Update: 13/09/2026
We’re a unified force of 170,000+ Associates, taking action every day toward the world we want tomorrow. Our Five Principles have kept us true to ourselves and to our commitment to treat others in ways that are consistent with those values. Having stood the test of ti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IFT Nutrition Division







Mars






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IFT Nutrition Division in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mars in 2026.
Incident History - IFT Nutrition Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IFT Nutrition Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mars (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mars cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IFT Nutrition Division

Mars
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 fails to restrict the advanced_config field to administrators, allowing non-admin users with manage permissions to inject arbitrary nginx directives. Attackers can inject malicious nginx configuration such as alias directives to serve arbitrary files or control routing for their assigned hosts.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/README.md#L36
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/user.js#L52-L62
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/templates/proxy_host.conf#L28
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/issues/5749
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-improper-authorization-via-advanced-config
Nginx Proxy Manager through 2.16.0 lacks rate-limiting on authentication endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make unlimited password guesses against any account. Attackers can brute-force login credentials via POST /api/tokens and subsequently guess TOTP codes via POST /api/tokens/2fa to gain full session access and administrative control.
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/app.js#L15-L58
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/2fa.js#L196-L240
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/blob/v2.16.0/backend/internal/token.js#L154-L182
- https://github.com/NginxProxyManager/nginx-proxy-manager/pull/5908
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nginx-proxy-manager-through-2.16.0-missing-brute-force-protection
httpdbg before 2.2.1 fails to validate URL schemes in recorded HTTP request URLs rendered as clickable links in the web interface. Attackers controlling traffic recorded by httpdbg can supply javascript: scheme URLs that execute malicious scripts in the application origin when clicked, allowing access to captured request and response data including headers and tokens.
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/hooks/recordhttp2.py#L88-L97
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/blob/v2.2.0/httpdbg/webapp/static/index.htm#L302
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/commit/121845b41c19ddaf30b51be0797bc2ff4847d8b3
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/issues/220
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/pull/222
- https://github.com/cle-b/httpdbg/releases/tag/v2.2.1
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/httpdbg-before-2.2.1-stored-cross-site-scripting-via-javascript-url
Dozzle versions before 11.1.2 fail to sanitize container display names when building ZIP archive entry names in the log download endpoint. Attackers who can label containers can use path traversal sequences to write files outside the extraction directory when users download and extract logs.
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/container/docker/client.go#L610-L614
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/v11.1.1/internal/web/download.go#L141-L146
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/commit/bc07db73dd84ce2cb939b744e983a8cfdf29c644
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/pull/5242
- https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/releases/tag/v11.1.2
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/dozzle-before-11.1.2-path-traversal-via-log-zip-download
A vulnerability has been found in Ziroom ZHOME A0101 1.0.1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /api/ZRQos/set_online_client. The manipulation of the argument ip leads to command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.