Comparison Overview
Nutanix Partners

Nutanix Partners
1740 Technology Drive, San Jose, 95110, US
Last Update: 18/03/2026
The way we work has changed overnight. Customers are embracing hybrid multicloud models. Partners are reinventing themselves to deliver ‘everything-as-a-service.’ Nutanix is here to help you meet these changes and more. Nutanix offers a true partnership, dedicated to d...

FIS
601 Riverside Ave, Jacksonville, 32202, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquart...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Nutanix Partners







FIS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Nutanix Partners in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FIS in 2026.
Incident History - Nutanix Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Nutanix Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Nutanix Partners

FIS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.