Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NUS College of Design & EngineeringNUS College of Design & Engineering
VS
University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
NUS College of Design & Engineering

NUS College of Design & Engineering

9 Engineering Drive 1 Block EA #07-26, Singapore, undefined, 117575, SG

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://cde.nus.edu.sg/
771/1000Fair

The NUS College of Design and Engineering (CDE) was officially formed in January 2022 from a fusion of two world-class schools – the Faculty of Engineering and the School of Design and Environment.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:167
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Alabama at Birmingham

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Administration Bldg Suite 1070, BIRMINGHAM, 35294-0110, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://uab.edu
797/1000Fair

Known for its innovative and interdisciplinary approach to education at both the graduate and undergraduate levels, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, a part of the University of Alabama System, is an internationally renowned research university and academic medic...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,634
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NUS College of Design & Engineering

NUS College of Design & Engineering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Alabama at Birmingham

University of Alabama at Birmingham

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NUS College of Design & Engineering in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Alabama at Birmingham in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NUS College of Design & Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NUS College of Design & Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Alabama at Birmingham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Alabama at Birmingham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NUS College of Design & Engineering

NUS College of Design & Engineering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering company and University of Alabama at Birmingham company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering and University of Alabama at Birmingham, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering and University of Alabama at Birmingham, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NUS College of Design & Engineering or University of Alabama at Birmingham ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NUS College of Design & Engineering or University of Alabama at Birmingham ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering and University of Alabama at Birmingham, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NUS College of Design & Engineering and University of Alabama at Birmingham, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67595
SUMMARY

VaahCMS versions 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 contain a malicious obfuscated JavaScript payload embedded in the Blade template responsible for rendering security OTP emails, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code in any browser that renders the affected email template with JavaScript enabled. The payload establishes a WebSocket connection to a hardcoded command-and-control endpoint, installs a password-field keylogger using MutationObserver to capture dynamically added inputs, scrapes WhatsApp Web DOM content, and accepts remote commands to redirect or overwrite the rendered page.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-15157
SUMMARY

undici does not validate the type property of a duck-typed blob-like request body before using it as the Content-Type header on the HTTP/1.1 dispatcher. In undici before 6.28.0, from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0, and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, an application that passes a hand-rolled blob-like body (via request, stream, pipeline, or dispatch) whose type is derived from untrusted input allows an attacker to inject CRLF sequences and append arbitrary HTTP headers, potentially smuggling a second request past the upstream. Native Blob objects are safe because their constructor strips CRLF from the type, and fetch is unaffected because it validates headers, but ecosystem libraries that build duck-typed blob shapes from user input can reach the vulnerable path. This is the same defect class as CVE-2022-35948 and CVE-2026-1527, on a header sink that the earlier fixes did not cover. The issue is fixed in undici 6.28.0, 7.29.0, and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-14643
SUMMARY

undici's cache interceptor mishandles optional whitespace placed around the equals sign of a qualified no-cache or private Cache-Control directive. In undici from 7.0.0 up to before 7.29.0 and from 8.0.0 up to before 8.9.0, the parser either drops the directive or stores a field name with literal quote characters, so the cache decision fails to recognize the qualification and the response is stored. In shared-cache mode, this lets a response containing one user's authenticated data be served from cache to a later caller, including an unauthenticated one, when both requests resolve to the same cache key. It affects applications that enable the cache interceptor in shared mode, forward Authorization headers upstream, and receive cacheable responses with qualified directives padded with whitespace around the equals sign. This is the whitespace-around-equals variant that the fix for CVE-2026-9678 did not normalize, and it is fixed in undici 7.29.0 and 8.9.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-69945
SUMMARY

kishan0725 Hospital Management System 4.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in /doctor/edit-patient.php?editid=1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-29
UPDATED
Date2026-07-29
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA