Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.
VS
Global Payments Inc.Global Payments Inc.
Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.

Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.

Büyükdere Caddesi, Sarıyer, TR

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Nurol Portföy Yönetimi, 1999’dan bu yana yatırımcılarına güvenilir ve dinamik yatırım bankacılığı hizmeti sunan Nurol Yatırım Bankası’nın %100 iştirakidir. Şirket, SPK’nın 25.11.2020 tarihli kuruluş izni ve 06.04.2021 tarihli faaliyet izniyle portföy yöneticiliği yetkis...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Global Payments Inc.

Global Payments Inc.

Atlanta, Georgia, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

Global Payments (NYSE: GPN) is a leading payment technology and software company that powers commerce for businesses of all sizes worldwide. We help businesses grow with confidence by delivering innovative solutions that enable seamless payment acceptance, smarter opera...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:24,855
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.

Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Global Payments Inc.

Global Payments Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Global Payments Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Global Payments Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Global Payments Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.

Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Global Payments Inc.

Global Payments Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GLO905072525

FAQ

Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. company and Global Payments Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. and Global Payments Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. and Global Payments Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. or Global Payments Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. or Global Payments Inc. ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. and Global Payments Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş. and Global Payments Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57995
SUMMARY

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56777
SUMMARY

n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-56700
SUMMARY

Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56415
SUMMARY

Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56413
SUMMARY

Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-30
UPDATED
Date2026-06-30
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9