Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NTTNTT
VS
Diebold NixdorfDiebold Nixdorf
NTT

NTT

5-1, Otemachi 1-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP, 100-8116

Last Update: 14/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.global.ntt/
758/1000Fair

NTT is a leading global technology innovator, providing a broad range of services to both consumers and businesses. As a mobile operator and provider of infrastructure, networks, and services, NTT is dedicated to promoting a sustainable future through cutting-edge innov...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:6,403
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://DieboldNixdorf.com
673/1000Weak

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:20,251
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NTT

NTT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

NTT has 32.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NTT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NTT

NTT

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NTTPLURALCARHEL1776148133
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIE1772015252
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DIE000081024
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DIE84429723

FAQ

Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NTT company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NTT and Diebold Nixdorf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NTT and Diebold Nixdorf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NTT or Diebold Nixdorf ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NTT or Diebold Nixdorf ?
Between NTT and Diebold Nixdorf, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NTT and Diebold Nixdorf, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9