Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NTT DOCOMONTT DOCOMO
VS
SFRSFR
NTT DOCOMO

NTT DOCOMO

2-11-1, Chiyoda-ku, 100-6150, JP

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
697/1000Weak

NTT DOCOMO, Japan's largest telecommunications company, provides innovative, convenient and secure mobile services that enable customers to realize smarter lives. The company serves over 73 million customers in Japan via advanced wireless networks, including a nationwid...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:1,625
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SFR

SFR

16, Rue du Général Alain de Boissieu, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://recrutement.sfr.com/
695/1000Weak

SFR is the number one alternative telecoms operator in France. SFR is also an operator providing a comprehensive range of services meeting the expectations of private and business customers alike, offering them the best of the digital world. At year-end 2011, the total ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:11,376
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NTT DOCOMO

NTT DOCOMO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SFR

SFR

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DOCOMO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

SFR has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - NTT DOCOMO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DOCOMO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SFR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SFR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NTT DOCOMO

NTT DOCOMO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NTT02621023
SFR

SFR

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATOSFR1787560233

FAQ

Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and SFR company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and SFR, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and SFR, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NTT DOCOMO or SFR ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NTT DOCOMO or SFR ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and SFR, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and SFR, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9