Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NTT DOCOMONTT DOCOMO
VS
OrangeOrange
NTT DOCOMO

NTT DOCOMO

2-11-1, Chiyoda-ku, 100-6150, JP

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
697/1000Weak

NTT DOCOMO, Japan's largest telecommunications company, provides innovative, convenient and secure mobile services that enable customers to realize smarter lives. The company serves over 73 million customers in Japan via advanced wireless networks, including a nationwid...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:1,625
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Orange

Orange

111, Quai du Président Roosevelt, Issy-les-Moulineaux, 92130, FR

Last Update: 15/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.orange.com
423/1000Critical

Orange is one of the world’s leading telecommunications operators with revenues of 40.3 billion euros in 2024 and 127,000 employees worldwide at 31 December 2024, including 71,000 employees in France. The Group has a total customer base of 291 million customers worldw...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:147,593
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NTT DOCOMO

NTT DOCOMO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Orange

Orange

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTT DOCOMO in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orange in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NTT DOCOMO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTT DOCOMO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Orange (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orange cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NTT DOCOMO

NTT DOCOMO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
NTT02621023
Orange

Orange

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ORA814090225
🔒 Incident : Breach
ORA1770804300
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ORA1770316673

FAQ

Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NTT DOCOMO company and Orange company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and Orange, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and Orange, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NTT DOCOMO or Orange ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NTT DOCOMO or Orange ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and Orange, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NTT DOCOMO and Orange, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA