Comparison Overview

NTPC Limited

VS

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

NTPC Limited

None, None, New Delhi, None, IN, None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ntpc.co.in

NTPC Limited is India’s largest power generation utility with roots planted way back in 1975 to accelerate power development in India. Since then it has established itself as the dominant power major with a presence in the entire value chain of the power generation business. From fossil fuels, it has forayed into generating electricity via hydro, nuclear and renewable energy sources. This foray will play a major role in lowering its carbon footprint by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. To strengthen its core business, the corporation has diversified into the fields of consultancy, power trading, training of power professionals, rural electrification, ash utilization and coal mining as well. NTPC Ltd. country’s largest power generation company with an installed capacity of over 80 GW For more details about us, visit www.ntpc.co.in

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 23,413
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd

Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2191
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eskom.co.za

Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating capacity, ranks ninth in terms of sales, and boasts the world's largest dry-cooling power station. Eskom Holdings’ Enterprises Division designs, builds and refurbishes Eskom’s assets, and acts as a catalyst for project development for the group. Eskom Enterprises’ main focus is to support Eskom Holdings and be the custodian of non-regulated businesses and offer strategic and commercial lifecycle services to the line divisions.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 41,778
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntpc.jpeg
NTPC Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NTPC Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTPC Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — NTPC Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTPC Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ntpc.jpeg
NTPC Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eskom.jpeg
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NTPC Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NTPC Limited company has not reported any.

In the current year, Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company and NTPC Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor NTPC Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company nor NTPC Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while NTPC Limited company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NTPC Limited company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NTPC Limited company nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd company employs more people globally than NTPC Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NTPC Limited nor Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References