Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System LtdNTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd
VS
MRVMRV
NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd

NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd

Harokmim 26, Holon, 5885849, IL

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nta.co.il
751/1000Fair

• NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd is a government owned organization, established to provide solutions to traffic problems in the Dan Region. • Founded in 1997, NTA is in charge of the design and implementation of a Mass Transit System for the Dan Region. • A...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:306
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
MRV

MRV

Av. Prof. Mario Werneck, 621, Belo Horizonte, 30.455-610, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mrv.com.br
795/1000Fair

Some 45 years ago, we set out with the ambitious goal of providing affordable housing, working to make Brazilian dreams come true. Over the last few years, we have crafted and shaped our story, becoming a brand-leading platform that offers a variety of housing solutions...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:17,156
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd

NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MRV

MRV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MRV in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MRV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MRV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd

NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NTA04241022
MRV

MRV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd company and MRV company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd and MRV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd and MRV, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd or MRV ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd or MRV ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd and MRV, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between NTA - Metropolitan Mass Transit System Ltd and MRV, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA