Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme DivisionNaval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division
VS
United States Department of WarUnited States Department of War
Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division

4363 Missile Way, Port Hueneme, CA, 93043, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile

Naval Surface Warfare Center, Port Hueneme Division (NSWC PHD) employs more than 2,500 engineers, scientists, technicians, logisticians, and support personnel who provide the United States Navy surface fleet with integration, test and evaluation, life-cycle engineering,...

NAICS:928
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:469
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

Washington, DC, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://war.gov
812/1000Good

The mission of the Department of War is to provide military forces necessary to protect the security of our country. The U.S. military defends the homeland, deters adversaries, and builds security around the world by projecting U.S. influence and working with allies and...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:67,477
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Department of War in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Department of War (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Department of War cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division

Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division company and United States Department of War company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division and United States Department of War, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division and United States Department of War, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division or United States Department of War ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division or United States Department of War ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division and United States Department of War, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme Division and United States Department of War, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1