Comparison Overview
NSW TrainLink

NSW TrainLink
470 Pitt Street, Sydney, New South Wales, AU, 2008
Last Update: 12/03/2026
NSW TrainLink is proud to connect people and communities throughout NSW and encourages people to choose us because we are a better way to go. We provide intercity, regional and interstate train and coach services for customers travelling longer distances. The train and...

Swift Transportation
2200 S. 75th Ave, Phoenix, 85043, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
Swift Transportation is the largest full-truckload motor carrier in North America. Based in Phoenix, Arizona, the Swift terminal network includes over thirty full-service facilities in the United States and Mexico. Swift provides a full line of service solutions, includ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

NSW TrainLink







Swift Transportation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for NSW TrainLink in 2026.
Incidents vs Transportation/Trucking/Railroad Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Swift Transportation in 2026.
Incident History - NSW TrainLink (X = Date, Y = Severity)
NSW TrainLink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Swift Transportation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Swift Transportation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

NSW TrainLink

Swift Transportation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.